Skip to content

How will Eastgate development affect Leeds Kirkgate Market?

October 8, 2010

The latest proposals by developers for the redevelopment of Eastgate were put on public display on Friday 24th and Saturday 25th September in the Victoria Quarter in Leeds. They represent an enormous retail and entertainment development (1 million sq f)  on the East of Leeds City Centre which will be immediately adjacent to Leeds Kirkgate Market. The plans can be traced back to before 2004 and are extremely controversial, not least because they involve major demolition of existing buildings and enterprises. Throughout, Leeds City Council has been keen to entice the private developers – Hammerson and Town Centre Securities – to include a redevelopment of Kirkgate Market in the Eastgate project. In 2008 a public consultation was conducted on this very possibility. The new plans for the Eastgate Development however do not consider this option. This might be good news as the previous proposal included a major restructuring of the Market, demolishing almost the whole of the 1975/1981 area with a lot of uncertainty for traders.

The new proposals still pose a potential threat, however. When we asked the developers at the exhibition the consequences for Kirkgate Market it was clear that not much thought had been given to this and all they could say was that it would be very positive. The Council clearly believes it will have an impact as it has been signaled as one of the reasons why the Market strategy is delayed and it keeps being mentioned as a good prospect for the Market.

However we believe that there are serious concerns about the impact of the project on the Market

1. The Eastgate development will be built on top of the car park that currently serves the Market. This is a BIG WORRY  for traders and customers. At the moment car parking is always an issue mentioned by customers as to why they don’t use the Market more. In fact it came out as the most common response (14%)  in the 2008 consultation when asked what would make people visit the Market more often (“Greater parking provision/free parking”). When we have been out there talking to people this always turns up as a huge worry. The Eastgate project will have parking (as much as double as now) but on the other side of the development and it will be managed by a private contractor not the Council as now with the possibility of higher carpark chargers. One big advantage of shopping at Kirkgate Market is its affordability but this is jeopardised if you have to pay high parking charges; it will be impossible to compete with out-of-town shopping centres.

2. The idea of yet another property development scheme hanging in the air creates instability and uncertainty for traders. To the extent that often traders are not able to get loans as banks don’t like the risk that a new retail development next door to the Market could entail. Traders have repeatedly asked the Council to issue a public statement guaranteeing the long term future of the Market which they could use to show banks the long terms prospects of their business but this has not materialised.

3. The Eastgate development aims to complete the gentrification of the shopping city centre. As expressed by the developers it intends to be an extension of the “Victoria Quarter” with the same kind of shopping in mind. In the latest design a John Lewis store will sit side by side to Kirkgate Market. The Council has said repeatedly that this will increase footfall in Kirkgate Market but it is hard to see how the same customer that shops in John Lewis or in the other luxury brands that are said to be coming to Eastgate will seamlessly walk and consume in Kirkgate Market. This could of course be a possibility if the gentrification of Kirkgate Market was a back strategy. Kirkgate Market will be left in an island surrounded by the Victoria Quarter, Eastgate, the regenerated Kirkgate Street and the upmarket Corn Exchange. There will be no excuses left for Kirkgate Market to continue to be an affordable shopping space accessible to low-income populations – a big chunk of Leeds! .

But the Eastgate development is far from finalised. The project got given outline planning permission in 2007 and was subsequently extended but they still need the planning permission to be approved by the Council. There will be consultation but in the meantime the developers say they want to hear your views so let’s all write what we think.

Advertisements
7 Comments leave one →
  1. Ian permalink
    October 11, 2010 8:39 am

    I’ve shopped in John Lewis, and the Victoria Quarter (love Yo Sushi!) but also regularly shop in Kirkgate market. By regularly, I mean 4-5 times a week, and it’s the source of nearly all of our fruit, vegetables, fish and meat.

    Please don’t assume that there isn’t a lot of crossover between those who use “upmarket” shops and those who like the variety, vibrancy, quality and low-cost of shopping in the market, because there is IMO.

    As for “gentrification”, the market does need a fair bit of vision, and a healthy dose of spit and polish, but this must fall short of trying to make it into a sad clone of what we have elsewhere in Leeds. It would really annoy me was if we started to lose the fresh food, or if prices crept up. I’m not going to start going to supermarkets – nasty places!

    Ian

  2. ROGER SHAW permalink
    November 8, 2010 12:41 pm

    I share concerns that Kirkgate Market will suffer from access problems and loss of immediately convenient car parking and delivery/collection facilities when the Eastgate Development starts. Crucially all facilities will be lost for some years during development and before any car parking facilities become available. How can the Market survive this period?

    From examination of the exhibited proposals I am appalled to see that Eastgate is to be closed to traffic, for the supposed benefit of a pedestrian area which will no doubt be contaminated with loud street performers, sales and survey people, youths on skateboards and bicycles performing dangerously on railings and street furniture and alcohol-fuelled groups.
    It took over a Century for Leeds to create a continuous route through the centre, realigning old streets to form The Headrow and Eastgate and now it is proposed to throw all this away by closing the route! This now forms the main bus and transport route West-East and connection to the Bus Station, already fully used. Where does this traffic go?

    From enquiries it appears that the buses will be diverted to George Street alongside Kirkgate Market where it will form a dangerous barrier between the Eastgate/John Lewis development and the Market and will surely prevent any delivery/collection facility so vital to the Traders, let alone their Customers! This will ruin any prospect of mutual benefits for the Market and new shopping. What is Leeds Council and its Planning Officers thinking about even to consider such a proposal? The Market Traders and Friends need to unite and press this aspect urgently.

    Pedestrian areas can be created anywhere in the Development plans so why destroy Eastgate? Most attractive Town places are the narrow streets and passages, arcades, intimate spaces and yards of which Leeds has an abundance and not the wide open windy spaces littered with street furniture and paved with chewing gum. The Eastgate Scheme has not been thought through other than as its benefit to developers and investors and the Council needs the pressure of its citizens to support it in ensuring that the developments suit the City and its citizens. Act now before it is too late!

  3. C Alcock permalink
    July 13, 2011 11:57 am

    I shop regularly in Leeds market and I work on Quarry Hill. The whole area has been badly neglected over the last 10 years and, in my opinion, is the ‘rough quarter’ of the city, rather than the so-called Arts Quarter. Kikgate Market is a unique building. Its claim to fame, apart from the magnificent architecture, is Michael Marks (Marks & Spencer)opened his first market stall there in 1884. It could ideally be a prime feature in the development and new buildings should be complementary to it, unlike the ugly multi-storey car park. George Street is a busy thoroughfare for pedestrians coming to/from the bus/coach station, Quarry Hill and beyond. It would be so much more attractive as a pedestrian area (delivery vehicles allowed at certain times) and Eastgate could be left alone.

Trackbacks

  1. Leeds today: Kirkstall Abbey, global justice, Otley dog dirt and Eastgate’s market impact | All PC Games Site
  2. 2010 in review « Friends of Leeds Kirkgate Market
  3. Market Inquiry Part 3 (08/02/2011) « Friends of Leeds Kirkgate Market
  4. Eastgate development outline application now received. What’s in it for the Market? « Friends of Leeds Kirkgate Market

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: